Yonathan Cohen

Yonathan Cohen

These are the best posts from Yonathan Cohen.

40 viral posts with 7,618 likes, 4,666 comments, and 229 shares.
37 image posts, 0 carousel posts, 1 video posts, 0 text posts.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Go deeper on Yonathan Cohen's LinkedIn with the ContentIn Chrome extension ๐Ÿ‘ˆ

Best Posts by Yonathan Cohen on LinkedIn

Claude is making every other AI tool irrelevant.

Here's why:

โ˜‘ Ideas โ†’ ๐™ฒฬถ๐š‘ฬถ๐šŠฬถ๐šฬถ๐™ถฬถ๐™ฟฬถ๐šƒฬถ.
Claude reasons deeper, follows instructions with precision, and delivers production-ready results

โ˜‘ Coding โ†’ ๐™ฒฬถ๐šžฬถ๐š›ฬถ๐šœฬถ๐š˜ฬถ๐š›ฬถ.ย 
Now Claude Code handles full features, refactors, and architecture. 4-5x faster.

โ˜‘ UI/UX โ†’ ๐™ตฬถ๐š’ฬถ๐šฬถ๐š–ฬถ๐šŠฬถ.ย 
Now Claude Design lets me describe a dashboard and get a full interactive prototype in seconds.

โ˜‘ Automations โ†’ ๐š—ฬถ๐Ÿพฬถ๐š—ฬถ.ย 
Now I tell Claude what to do and it runs every morning on autopilot.

Most people still switch between 5 tools in 2026.

Are you already full Claude?
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
I paid Claude $2.34 for a $0.31 answer.

One prompt fixes it:

Here's the test. 20 files, 107,000 tokens, one question, same correct answer both times:

Opus reading everything itself
โ†’ 204k Opus cache-write tokens, $2.34

With a Haiku reader agent
โ†’ 22.7k Opus cache-write tokens, $0.31

When Claude reads a file directly, that file lands in your main conversation and gets resent on later turns through prompt caching, until something clears it or compacts it. Your bill grows. Your answers get vaguer. And you don't notice either one until you open the usage screen.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜

โ†’ a second Claude with its own window.

โ†’ it reads all 107,000 tokens, then hands you back a paragraph. 9x less lands in your conversation.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ธ

โ†’ a subagent can run on its own model. Put the reading on Haiku.

โ†’ Opus never sees the files. It reads the summary and makes the call. That's the 87%.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—น๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ

โ†’ Claude Code's built-in Explore agent used to run on Haiku. Since v2.1.198 it inherits your session model instead.

โ†’ better exploration, bigger bill. If you work in Opus, searches delegated to Explore now run on Opus. A custom Explore file puts them back on Haiku.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฝ

โ†’ one prompt. Claude writes both files itself.

โ†’ approve the write, restart, done. 2 minutes.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

Copy-paste the prompt into your Claude Code and you're set. It's here: https://tally.so/r/ODZpLp
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
My Claude session limit hit 100%.

I kept working anyway. Here's the setup:

You know the moment. "You're out of messages for a few hours." Mid-task.

ChatGPT or Gemini would happily take over. Except they know nothing about your work: not the draft, not the decisions, not the ideas you already killed.

So I built a Skill called "handoff". One word, and it writes a handoff file before the session dies:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ

โ†’ so the next AI doesn't reopen debates you already closed.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€, ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ

โ†’ the full draft, not a summary of it. The next AI continues your text, it doesn't rewrite it from memory.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐˜€ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ

โ†’ so it doesn't proudly propose the idea you killed an hour ago.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ

โ†’ your tone rules, your formats, your "never do this" list.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฝ

โ†’ one instruction. The new session starts working, not asking.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

Paste that file into ChatGPT, Gemini, or whatever you have open. It continues without asking a single question.

And the part I like: Skills follow an open standard. The exact same file runs in ChatGPT too.

For Claude Code users I went further: at 90% usage it triggers itself. The handoff lands on my desktop, already in my clipboard, before I even notice the session filling up.

Here the Skill: https://tally.so/r/eqjYAo
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
I started getting way more replies on LinkedIn.

Hereโ€™s exactly what I did:

I send personalized decks about them!
Made in just a few minutes with Gamma.

The psychology behind what works:
โ†’ They check your profile = theyโ€™re curious
โ†’ You send a personalized deck = theyโ€™re surprised
โ†’ The deck looks great = theyโ€™re impressed
โ†’ Result = real conversation

Why it works perfectly:
โ†’ Professional designs in seconds
โ†’ Every deck feels unique.

Most people send โ€œletโ€™s connectโ€ messages.
You send a custom deck in 2 minutes.

The difference:
Cold message โ†’ often ignored
Personalized deck โ†’ real engagement

Comment "Gamma" to get the workflow.
People use 10% of what Claude can do.

They talk to the brain & never touch the body.

Here's the full anatomy:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป โ†’ the model

โžค Fable runs multi-day projects solo.ย 
Plans, executes, checks its own work.

โžค Opus handles complex builds, agents, heavy coding.

โžค Sonnet takes the daily work.ย 
Writing, everyday tasks, fast and cheap.

โžค Haiku fires instantly for high volume.

One brain, four gears. You pick per task.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

๐—˜๐˜†๐—ฒ๐˜€ โ†’ web search + Claude for Chrome

Sees the live web and acts on it.
Reads pages, fills forms, navigates workflows.
Not just training data (whatโ€™s current).

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜€ โ†’ Code, Cowork, Design

Delivers usable outputs, not just drafts.
Working code. Structured docs.
On-brand decks. Clickable prototypes.
Often in minutes.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

๐—ก๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐˜€๐˜†๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—บ โ†’ MCP connectors

Connects into your real stack.
Gmail, Slack, HubSpot, Notion, your database.
Stops asking you to paste data.
Starts pulling it directly.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

๐— ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€ โ†’ Skills

Reusable actions.
โ€œPrep this call.โ€ โ€œClean this list.โ€
Define once, run anytime.
No re-explaining.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

๐— ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† โ†’ memory + past chats

Remembers how you work.
What you sell, your tone, your context.
Each session starts with continuity.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ โ†’ Projects

The structure holding everything together.
Files, instructions, context in one place.
Every part pulls from the same source.


โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

Most people meet the brain.
I wire the whole body into companies.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Claude is annoying, 900 words to just say yes.

One file cut it to 3 lines. Here it is:

๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ: it opened with "depends on what you optimize for", walked through both ecosystems, weighed Pixel against Samsung, and landed on iPhone in the last sentence.

๐—”๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: it opened with "iPhone", gave the one reason that decides it, and named who should pick the other one instead.

Same verdict. It just took 200 words to get there instead of 20.

Here's what the file tells it:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—”๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜, ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ

โ†’ never the context first. The decision, then the why.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ "๐—œ๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜€" ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฑ

โ†’ it says what it depends on in one line, picks the likely case, and answers that.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—” ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ

โ†’ no balanced table of both sides. It picks one, then names who the other one is for.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ข๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜…

โ†’ doesn't fit on your phone? Then it's two answers. It gives one and offers the other.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ก๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฑ๐˜€

โ†’ not "this takes a while" but "40 minutes". Not "cheaper" but "half the price".

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—œ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—œ'๐—บ ๐˜„๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ

โ†’ no three paragraphs of polite agreement before the actual disagreement.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—˜๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฝ

โ†’ something I can do in two minutes. Never "let me know if you have questions".

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

It's a Skill. A file you drop in once, and every answer after that changes.

Works in ChatGPT too, paste it as a custom instruction.

the Skill: https://tally.so/r/D4ov1X
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
I cut my Fable 5 bill by 90% with the same accuracy.

Here's the open source Skill:

Fable 5 is the best model I've ever used, and 10x the price of Haiku.
(Everything below is measured live on the API, not estimated).

The whole principle fits in one sentence:

The smart model thinks once.
The cheap model executes a thousand times.

3 commands:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น

โ†’ Fable studies examples you already handled right and writes a reusable rulebook.
โ†’ You pay for the thinking once.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ณ๐˜†

โ†’ Haiku applies the rulebook to every new request.
โ†’ On my benchmark (15 labeled prospect replies): same accuracy as Fable, 93% vs 93%, at 10x lower cost.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜†๐˜‡๐—ฒ

โ†’ For the big stuff (meeting transcripts, long threads): Haiku workers read and compress everything.
โ†’ Fable only reads the briefs and decides.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

The numbers over 10,000 classifications:

โ†’ Fable alone: ~$79
โ†’ With the Skill: ~$8

Same quality. 90% saved.

And the best part is what did NOT work.

The "obvious" hack, Haiku consulting Fable while it answers, costs 19x MORE than Fable alone. Measured. The advisor thinks at full depth on every single call, and you pay for every token of it.

(Works in Claude Code)
Comment 'Skill' to get it.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Claude now runs your Skills inside Chrome.

Here's what that changes:

Until last week, the browser extension lived in its own silo: separate conversations, no shared Skills or connectors, no continuity with Claude elsewhere.

Now the side panel IS a Claude Cowork session. Your conversations are saved, your Skills and connectors work there, and the session follows you across Chrome, desktop, web, and mobile.

And Claude sees the page you're on. That's the part that matters:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜† ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ, ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป

โ†’ your outreach Skill drafts the message from what's on screen. No copy-paste, no context to re-explain.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ฟ ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฏ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ, ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป

โ†’ Claude reads the pricing page you're staring at and drafts the first line that mentions it.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐˜€ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ

โ†’ it clicks, types and fills, in your session, with your logins. The CRM update happens where the CRM lives.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐˜„๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ธ

โ†’ schedule the browser task once. Claude comes back and runs it automatically.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—น๐—น๐—ผ๐˜„๐˜€ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚

โ†’ start on a prospect's page in Chrome, finish on your phone in the metro. Nothing restarts, nothing is lost.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Iโ€™ve built 100+ workflows.

Hereโ€™s what nobody tells you:

Simple beats clever. Every time.

โ†’ The Truth:
Every node you add is a future point of failure.
And failures happen when you canโ€™t afford them.

โ†’ What Senior Builders Know:
The skill isnโ€™t building complex systems.
Itโ€™s achieving the same result with less.

Anyone can add 20 nodes.
Few can accomplish the same with 5.

โ†’ The Reality:
Your client sees two things:
- Does it work?
- How fast is it fixed when it doesnโ€™t?

Complex workflows fail both tests.

โ†’ What to Do:
Challenge every single node.
Is it essential or just โ€œnice to haveโ€?

Most workflows are mostly bloat.
Strip them down to the core.

The best workflow isnโ€™t impressive.
Itโ€™s invisible.
It just works.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
He made $350k in AI consulting, 0 of it from agents.

Here's what companies actually pay for instead:

Their AI kept giving generic answers.

The problem โ†’ Their data lived in 20 tools that never talked to each other.

So the real work is unsexy. Connect it all:

1/ The tools they already own, wired into one place
โ†’ CRM, billing, support, docs. One source, not 20 silos.

2/ AI that reads across all of it at once
โ†’ the whole business in one view, not one tool at a time.

3/ "Why did churn jump?" answered in seconds
โ†’ the question that used to take an analyst a week.

4/ Dashboards and reports that build themselves
โ†’ ask for it, it's there. No BI team.

5/ One screen that shows what's actually happening
โ†’ the thing they thought an agent would give them.

Do it once, and every automation after gets 10x faster. That's why it's sticky. And why it's $15k a month.

Everyone wants the agent.
The winners connect the dots.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
I haven't opened n8n in months.

For on-demand work, I just ask Claude.

The features were never the problem.

n8n, Zapier and Make are as powerful as ever.
40-step scenarios, branching, error handling, all of it still runs.

What changed is the experience.

The old way:
โ†’ Open the canvas
โ†’ Drag the nodes
โ†’ Map every field
โ†’ Test, fix, deploy

All of that to send one personalized email.

The new way:
"Research this lead, write the email, book the slot."

Claude takes the action on your stack.
You never touch a canvas.

Triggers, webhooks and 24/7 jobs still belong to the platforms. That is not what Skills replace.

n8n shipped automations.
Claude ships results.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
The CEO of HubSpot just killed cold outbound.

Most won't know what to do next.

She said:
"Stop emailing people just because they fit your ICP."

Replace it with signals:
โ†’ Who's hiring in your market
โ†’ Who just got promoted
โ†’ Who's engaging with competitors
โ†’ Who changed jobs

The problem?
She described the playbook.
Not the how.

Most teams will read her post.
Then go back to blasting emails.

Because tracking signals manually doesn't scale.
One account at a time.
She even said it herself: "painfully slow.

Every day I check:

โ†’ Who's commenting on my competitors' posts
โ†’ Who's asking "any alternatives to X?"
โ†’ Which accounts are hiring key roles
โ†’ Who just raised a round

The CEO of HubSpot gave you the why.

This is the how.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
People waste $10k/month on nonsense.

But won't spend $500 to save 100 hours.

They'll pay for:
โ†’ Subscriptions they don't use
โ†’ Consultants they don't need
โ†’ Courses they never finish

But automation? "Too expensive."

Meanwhile, they're doing:
โ€ข Data entry
โ€ข Email sequences
โ€ข Invoice chasing
โ€ข Report building

The reality:

You waste $10k/month on unused tools.
Automation costs $500/month.

You're literally paying 20x more to stay busy than to be productive.

Fix it this week:

โ†’ Cancel one thing you don't use
โ†’ Automate one boring task
โ†’ Get 20 hours back
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Just saw this Reddit post about AI agents.

Finally, someone telling the truth.

WHAT THEY SELL YOU:

"AI agents work 24/7 automatically!"

WHAT REALLY HAPPENS:

Your AI texts customers who left in 2012.
Why? Your customer data is in 3 different broken Excel files.

THE REAL PROBLEM:

The AI works fine.
Your 20-year-old computer system doesn't.

Company still uses Windows XP.
Took 3 months just to connect the AI to it.

WHAT ACTUALLY WORKS:

Company wanted to automate everything.
Instead, built tool that only checks if forms are complete.
That's it, saves 3 hours weekly and they're happy.

Start with one tiny task, not your entire business.

AI agents aren't smart employees.
They're toddlers with database access.

Everyone's pretending this is easy.
It's not.

But nobody admits it.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Everyone say AI agents handling complex tasks.

Let's do the math nobody wants to see.

If each step has 95% reliability:
- 5 steps = 77% success
- 10 steps = 60% success
- 20 steps = 36% success

That's before costs, hallucinations, or human oversight.

Working AI agents do ONE thing well.
- Parse an invoice.
- Summarize emails.
- Check empty fields.
Not orchestrate your entire business.

The pattern is clear:
Complex agents = impressive demos
Simple agents = actual revenue

The revolution is not about agents doing everything
itโ€™s about agents doing something perfectly.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
GTM engineers get paid $150K/year for this.
I turned 1,000,000 emails into buyers.ย 
Here's the playbook:

Everyone has this file: newsletter signups, an old export, a form nobody opened again.

Thousands of addresses. And you can't sell to an address.

3 moves fixed it:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐˜‚๐—ฝ

โ†’ You give FullEnrich an email, it gives you back the person: name, job title, company, size, country, LkIn.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐˜

โ†’ Claude wrote it in one prompt. it fed all 1,000,000 addresses through, 100 at a time, for 3 days.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด

โ†’ Everyone scored by company size and role. you can add any signal you want, it's your scoring.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

The funnel, start to finish:

โ†’ 1,000,000 addresses in
โ†’ 698,000 real humans identified (69.8% match rate)
โ†’ 74,212 people who actually run something
โ†’ 12,408 worth a message

The full playbook doesn't fit in a post, the exact prompt for Claude / ChatGPT + the 5-minute FullEnrich setup.

So I put it on one page: https://tally.so/r/gDVaVP
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
OpenAI & Anthropic now embed engineers in teams

Here's what it means for you:

Andrew Ng recently put a name on the role that's suddenly everywhere: Forward Deployed Engineer. Palantir pioneered it 20 years ago. The AI labs just revived it.

Why?

Because a model out of the box knows everything about the world and nothing about your world.

Not your pricing rules.
Not your approval chain.
Not the three questions your best rep always asks.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”
โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ฝ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ป'๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น

โ†’ most teams aren't blocked because Claude or GPT isn't smart enough.

They're blocked because nobody translated their work into something a model can run.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”
โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ท๐—ผ๐—ฏ

โ†’ which step is a rule?
โ†’ which one needs judgment?
โ†’ what context does the AI need?
โ†’ what requires human approval?

That's not prompting. That's workflow design.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”
โ˜‘ ๐—”๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ป'๐˜ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—น

The person wiring your company into AI shouldn't make switching providers impossible.

Today switching models is painful. Next year you'll wish it wasn't.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

I built a 5-question check to tell you which one you're dealing with: a model problem or a wiring problem.

30 seconds: https://tally.so/r/rj8a0p
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Just saw this Reddit post about AI agents.

Finally, someone telling the truth.

WHAT THEY SELL YOU:

"AI agents work 24/7 automatically!"

WHAT REALLY HAPPENS:

Your AI texts customers who left in 2012.
Why? Your customer data is in 3 different broken Excel files.

THE REAL PROBLEM:

The AI works fine.
Your 20-year-old computer system doesn't.

Company still uses Windows XP.
Took 3 months just to connect the AI to it.

WHAT ACTUALLY WORKS:

Company wanted to automate everything.
Instead, built tool that only checks if forms are complete.
That's it, saves 3 hours weekly and they're happy.

Start with one tiny task, not your entire business.

AI agents aren't smart employees.
They're toddlers with database access.

Everyone's pretending this is easy.
It's not.

But nobody admits it.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
ChatGPT and Claude are not the same for cold email.

Here's exactly who does what:

Most people pick one and use it for everything. That's why their outreach is either smart and robotic, or human and shallow.

The split I use:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

๐—–๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ โ†’ what to say

โ†’ Give it a prospect and it digs. It finds a real reason to reach out, not a recycled line from your last chat.
โ†’ Hand it a brief for 50 people and it holds the rules without drifting.
โ†’ It thinks about the whole account, not one email at a time.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜๐—š๐—ฃ๐—ง โ†’ how it sounds

โ†’ Warmer, more human first line. It writes like a person, not a template.
โ†’ Fast at variations: 10 subject lines, 5 openers, keep the one that lands.
โ†’ Best at "make this sound less like AI."

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

So I run them in order:
Claude finds the angle. ChatGPT gives it a voice.

Use one for both, and you feel the gap. Smart with no warmth, or warm with nothing to say.

ChatGPT writes the sentence.
Claude finds the reason to send it.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
I send custom proposals with a Stripe payment link.

5 min after a prospect is ready.

Most teams take 48 hours.

So I stopped creating proposals.
Now I just review and approve them.

Hereโ€™s how it works:

โ†’ Move deal to โ€œProposalโ€ in my CRM
โ†’ Gamma builds a webpage on their data
โ†’ Pricing + Stripe payment link included
โ†’ Quick review
โ†’ Prospect gets a private link

No PDF.
No manual work.

Why this works:

They asked for it
Theyโ€™re still in buying mode
They can move forward immediately

Most teams create proposals.

โ†’ I send a decision.

Gamma builds.
Stripe collects.
Momentum closes.

---
Comment "SEND" to receive the setup
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
There's a way to combine all 5 top AIs in one search.

Here's how:

Each AI has strengths and weaknesses.
Combined, they give you the complete picture.

Better information = better decisions.

You don't need 5 different subscriptions.

You type one prompt and Bright Data pulls answers from all 5 AIs.

My system combines them into one clear response.

Comment "Bright Data" to get the tool and try it out.

This replaces hours of research with one search.
Your team gets better answers faster.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Claude Skills run inside Chrome now.

These 5 turn any tab into prospects:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ /๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ

โ†’ open any company website

โ†’ find the people you'd actually want to talk to

โ†’ FullEnrich gets the work email + mobile

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ /๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

โ†’ your happiest client left for another company

โ†’ this finds everyone who used to work at your best accounts, and where they landed

โ†’ the warmest lead you'll ever get, enriched by FullEnrich

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ /๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ

โ†’ find one company you love

โ†’ get 20 more that look like it

โ†’ then find the right buyers inside each one

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ /๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜‚๐—ฝ

โ†’ open a conference page, funding article, directory, or "Top 100" list

โ†’ Claude extracts every company on the page

โ†’ FullEnrich turns them into actual prospects

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ /๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ถ๐˜€

โ†’ open an email, a bio, a contact page

โ†’ one command tells you who the person is, where they work, and whether they're worth your time

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

the tab you're already looking at becomes the input.

FullEnrich handles the people and company data underneath.

The 5 Skills, ready to install: https://tally.so/r/RGyG1P
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
I got a 29% reply rate with this

And it's actually stupid simple:

1 โ†’ Add viktor.com to your Slack
2 โ†’ Tell him what you sell (once)
3 โ†’ Say: "go find me 50 prospects"

That's it.

No list to buy. No URLs to paste.

He looks where your next clients already are:
- who's hiring for the problem you solve,
- who engages with your competitors,
- who's already in your network.

Then he reads each website.
And writes a deck about them.

He told me this in Slack last night:

"50 companies tonight, with the reason each one made the list. 50 decks in your drafts at 7am."

Each deck is unique.
About THEIR business.
Selling YOUR services.

Most people send the same cold message to 100 prospects.

This sends a custom investigation to each one.

get started with viktor.com - $100 in free credits.
Link in the first comment.

Partnership with Viktor.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
No-code democratizes who can build.

Here's how each industry is adapting.

NO-CODE ADOPTION BY SECTOR (2025):

Marketing โ€“ strong adoption
- Campaign workflows
- Customer segmentation
- Performance tracking

Sales โ€“ widespread adoption
- Lead management
- Multi-channel prospecting
- Pipeline workflows

Services โ€“ growing steadily
- Workflow digitalization
- Process optimization
- Client management systems

Retail โ€“ moderate adoption
- Inventory management
- Order processing
- Customer support workflows

Finance โ€“ cautious but expanding
- Compliance workflows
- Invoice processing
- Fraud detection systems

Healthcare โ€“ fastest growing
- Patient record management
- Appointment scheduling
- Insurance processing

No-code enables business teams to solve their own problems.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
+1 billion use ChatGPT & Claude each month.

That's where your market is.

75 billion prompts a month on ChatGPT alone.
That's where work happens now.

Two mechanisms put your SaaS inside the chat:

โ˜‘ ๐— ๐—–๐—ฃ = your product becomes a server the AI calls. The user asks, your product runs, nobody leaves the chat.

โ˜‘ ๐—ฆ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐˜€ = you package a concrete workflow. The AI knows how to use your product to finish the task.

The 3 levels of presence inside AI:

1 โ†’ Cited. The AI mentions your site.
2 โ†’ Called. Your product runs inside the chat (MCP).
3 โ†’ Method. The AI knows how to execute your workflow (Skills).

The SaaS that wins is the one your users never have to leave the chat to use.

PS: I build Skills for B2B SaaS that want to live inside ChatGPT and Claude.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Most AI agents break after 5 minutes.

This one builds itself and runs 24/7:

1 โ†’ Go to Base44 and open Superagent.
2 โ†’ Describe what you want.
3 โ†’ Connect your tools (Gmail, Calendar, Slack,...)
4 โ†’ The agent builds itself. No code or setup.
5 โ†’ It starts running. 24/7. Without you.

What mine does every day:

โ†’ Checks my calendar and sends me a morning brief.
โ†’ Researches prospects before every call.
โ†’ Sends follow-up emails on my behalf.
โ†’ Monitors competitors and alerts me on WhatsApp.

Most people spend days setting up AI agents.
Docker, SSH keys, API configs, tutorials.

This took me 5 minutes and one sentence.

Try it โ†’ย https://lnkd.in/dY_wn6Up
10 Claude Skills for GTM.

Here's what each one does:

All 10 run on FullEnrich, inside Claude:

๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ
Describe your ICP. Get a prospect list.

๐—ฃ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ธ ๐—•๐˜‚๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ
Enter a company. Get a Gamma deck and the decision-maker to send it to.

๐—–๐—ฆ๐—ฉ ๐—˜๐—ป๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต
Upload a CSV. Enrich company and contact data.

๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด-๐˜๐—ผ-๐—ฃ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ
Turn names from your Granola calls into CRM-ready contacts.

๐—›๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐˜†๐—ป๐—ฐ
Research in Claude. Sync to HubSpot.

๐—Ÿ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ
Analyze a customer profile. Find similar companies.

๐—š๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—น ๐——๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐˜๐˜€
Find prospects. Get personalized drafts ready to send.

๐—ข๐—ฟ๐—ด ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ
Map a company's org and who to contact.

๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด
Describe a role. Get candidates ranked, who to call first.

๐—”๐˜๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ ๐—ฆ๐˜†๐—ป๐—ฐ
Research in Claude. Sync to Attio.

Today I'm showing some of these Skills in action at FullEnrich & Friends.

You can register here โ†’ https://lnkd.in/dtBesVKZ
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Everyone's obsessed with AI agents.

Here's the truth:

AI AGENTS:
โ†’ Hallucinate randomly
โ†’ Break without warning
โ†’ Need constant babysitting
โ†’ Cost a fortune to maintain

SMART AUTOMATION:
โ†’ Works every single time
โ†’ Never surprises you
โ†’ Runs for months untouched
โ†’ Costs 10x less

90% of businesses don't need an "AI agent."
They need a bulletproof automation that just works.

Examples:
- Invoice processing? Automation.
- Lead routing? Automation.
- Data entry? Automation.
- Report generation? Automation.

Save AI agents for the 10% of complex tasks that actually need them.

A clean automation beats a fancy agent.
Every time.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
LinkedIn will send you your whole network as a file.

Almost nobody asks for it:

Settings โ†’ Data privacy โ†’ Get a copy of your data.

This is a LinkedIn feature nothing to install or connect.

And it matters, because most companies go hunting outside for buyers they may already be connected to.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—œ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€

โ†’ with their company, their job title, their profile, and the date you connected.

โ†’ your network stops being an endless scroll and becomes a file you can actually sort.

But the export is only the raw material.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜

Company size.

Seniority.

Industry.

Whether they could actually buy from you.

Suddenly thousands of connections collapse into a much shorter list:

people who could actually buy what you sell, and who already have a relationship with you.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ธ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ

Someone you connected with three years ago might be in a completely different position today.

Maybe they became VP Sales.

Joined one of your target accounts.

Started building a team.

Moved into a company that suddenly looks like a customer.

The relationship is old.

The reason to talk can be brand new.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ฌ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ผ

The deal that went quiet.

The person who said "not right now."

The introduction you never followed up on.

"Not right now" was two years ago.

It might be now.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

Use it to decide who deserves a real message, one at a time.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
I asked Claude to read every call we lost.

It came back with the 4 reasons. Here's the prompt:

"Go through every deal we lost in the last 6 months. Read the notes, the emails and the call recordings. Tell me why each one was really lost, group them by reason, and show me what to fix first."

What came back:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป, ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—น๐—ผ๐—ด๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ฑ

โ†’ we mark "price" on everything. The calls said otherwise.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐—ท๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ

โ†’ the same sentence, different buyers, for months.
โ†’ nobody had put those calls side by side. Nobody could.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ

โ†’ not the day we marked it lost. The call where it stopped moving.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐˜… ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜

โ†’ ranked. Not a report. A decision.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

This runs on Attio.

It's AI-native, built that way from day one, so Claude reads your calls, emails and notes directly. Not the three fields someone remembered to fill in.

And it writes back into the objects your business actually defined, not a schema some vendor picked for you.

Your CRM already knows why you're losing. Nobody ever had the time to read it.

Most teams guess why deals die.
Mine asked the calls.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
I cloned myself for my website.
Now I'm on every page, talking to visitors.
Results have been incredible.

My Anam digital twin adapts to each page:

โ€ข Pricing: Knows all plans, handles objections
โ€ข Services: Details my process and examples
โ€ข Homepage: Guides visitors to what they need

THE DIFFERENCE:

Regular chatbot โ†’ Text only, generic responses
Anam twin โ†’ My face, my voice, real conversation

People don't want FAQs.
They want to talk to someone.

The impact so far:
โ†’ Longer site visits
โ†’ More meaningful interactions
โ†’ Higher lead quality

Help at the exact moment of interest.
24/7 availability.
My actual expertise and personality.
I create automation for a living.

But my own communication was fully manual.

I type 100+ messages a day.
Slack, email, WhatsApp, Notion.
~2 hours a day, all typed, all slow.

So I automated it.

I switched to Wispr Flow.
I talk โ†’ it types. Any app in 500ms.

Here's what makes it different from basic dictation:

โ˜‘ It reads your screen.ย 
It knows the context before you reply.

โ˜‘ It adapts tone per app.ย 
Slack stays casual. Email goes professional.

โ˜‘ It learns your words.ย 
Client names, technical terms, abbreviations.

But here's what sold me โ†’ Whisper mode.

You can dictate so quietly that nobody hears a thing.

Waiting for coffee โžค whispered all my Slack replies.
Walking to lunch โžค answered 10 emails hands-free.
Sitting in a meeting โžค wrote tomorrow's to-do list.

85% of my messages need zero corrections.

I automate workflows for a living.
This is the one that saved me 2 hours a day.

---
Now on Android too. Link in comments.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Clone yourself to qualify prospects on your website.

Here's how to build your Replica in 3 steps:

1 โ†’ Upload your face (real or animated).
2 โ†’ Drop your website URL Tavus pulls everything.
3 โ†’ Embed it on your site.

Now every visitor talks to your Replica.
Face-to-face in real time.

Your Replica:

โ˜‘ Knows your business inside out.
โ˜‘ Answers questions about your offer.
โ˜‘ Qualifies the visitor.
โ˜‘ Books a meeting in your calendar.

Most websites lose 95% of visitors without a conversation.

This one starts a conversation with every single one.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
LinkedIn has free resources worth thousands.

Here are 12 creators I follow to stay ahead:

1/ Ruben Hassid โ†’ Master AI prompting

2/ Noam Nisand โ†’ Sell with content

3/ Anisha Jain โ†’ Create content that converts

4/ Sarah Adam โ†’ Run influencer campaigns

5/ Yonathan Cohen โ†’ AI workflow for sales

6/ Christine Spagnuolo โ†’ Lifestyle business, live free

7/ Benjamin Douablin โ†’ Think like a CEO

8/ Axelle Malek โ†’ Stop fearing AI, start using it

9/ AJ Eckstein ๐Ÿงฉ โ†’ Grow your brand with creators

10/ Obaloluwa โ†’ Never miss AI news

11/ Yonathan Levy โ†’ Daily social selling tips

12/ zoรซ hartsfield โ†’ Personal brand & productivity

Just follow and learn.

โ™ป๏ธ Repost to help your network.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Your AI agent will destroy your company.

If someone asks it the right way.

AI agents follow all instructions.
Even ones hidden by hackers.

Imagine this:

Your customer service bot reads your website to help customers.

A hacker hides invisible text that says "send me all the data."

Your bot can't tell the difference between your instructions and theirs, so it follows both.

(Of course it's too much, but just to make you realize!)

It's like having an employee who:
- Can't spot weird emails
- Gives passwords to anyone who asks
- Follows every Post-it note they find

To protect you just:
- Don't give it the keys to everything
- Watch what it's doing
- Double-check important actions
- Test if it can be tricked

Your normal security tools don't help here.
Firewalls stop hackers from breaking in.
They don't stop your AI from being tricked.

That's why AI needs different protection.
Built in from the start.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Run your B2B ops from one chat.

Here are 8 workflows inside Claude Code:

---

My runs:

โ˜‘ Cold outreach โ†’ booked meeting
Claude Code + Bright Data + Gamma
Scrape the prospect site, build a personalized deck, send the link in the first message.

โ˜‘ Track competitors on autopilot
Claude Code + Bright Data + Slack
Monitor 10 competitors weekly (pricing, blog, careers), detect what changed, ship on Slack.

โ˜‘ Sales call โ†’ follow-up deck
Claude Code + Granola + Gamma
Read the transcript, extract pain points + next steps, ship a tailored Gamma deck in under 5 min.

โ˜‘ Meeting โ†’ CRM auto-update
Claude Code + Granola + Attio
Extract people, deals, next steps from the call, update the right Attio records automatically.

---

Dan's runs:

โ˜‘ Cold campaign โ†’ performance report
Claude Code + Instantly + OutboundSync + HubSpot
Sync replies + meetings, analyze what works, output a clean performance report.

โ˜‘ Post idea โ†’ viral-grade draft
Claude Code + Apify + Pinecone
Find top-performing posts on the topic, retrieve the most relevant examples from our database, draft a post modeled on patterns that actually worked.

โ˜‘ Finance ops on autopilot
Claude Code + Stripe
Generate invoices, find missing payments, reconcile books.

โ˜‘ Automation idea โ†’ working n8n workflow
Claude Code + n8n
Describe the automation in plain English, Claude builds the n8n workflow JSON, ready to run.

---

Most people use Claude as a chatbot.

We use it as our operating system.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
There's $10,000 worth of templates here.

But I give them free

Every week, I share practical workflows.
Openly available, built for real-world use.

What you get:

โ†’ Step-by-step workflows & video
โ†’ Template ready to use
โ†’ Frameworks that improve results

Here are some workflow you can find:

- AI-assisted sales workflows
- Lead enrichment systems
- Viral content generation engines
- Conversion boosters that scale

Knowledge shouldn't be locked behind high paywalls.
Execution matters more than information.

Find the workflows here:ย become-a-monster.com
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
An agent reads every ad my competitors run.

It tells me which ones print money:

We pointed it at AG1, the supplements brand, against its competitors:

โ†’ Seed: "a better digestion for less than a coffee a day". Running for ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฐ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€.

โ†’ Huel: "fast food again for lunch?" ๐Ÿญ๐Ÿต๐Ÿฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€.

โ†’ AG1: "75 vitamins in one scoop" and celebrity shots. Price and pain: untouched.

Nobody pays 8 months for an ad that loses money.
The agent caught the gap.

Here's what it does, every week:

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ

โ†’ Meta's Ad Library is public: the text, the format, the landing page, and how long each ad has been running.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—™๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ด๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€

โ†’ an ad running 200+ days is an ad that prints money. No brand keeps paying for a loser.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜€

โ†’ price, social proof, pain, FOMO. Who leans on what, and what changed since last week.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜€ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜๐˜€

โ†’ the angles your competitors exploit that you don't even touch.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

โ˜‘ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ถ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฆ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ, ๐— ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด

โ†’ new ads, killed ads, the winners with their exact copy, and the 3 angles to test this week.

โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”โ”

A human digging through the Ad Library would spend hours on this. The agent does it for you.

I built it on Twin. You describe the job, it builds the agent that does it weekly.

Try Twin:ย https://lnkd.in/dewBmk7B
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Most people run Claude Code one task at a time.

It now runs hundreds of agents in parallel.

Anthropic calls it dynamic workflows.

What it does:

โ˜‘ Splits one big task across hundreds of agents.
โ˜‘ Each takes a different angle.ย 
โ˜‘ It iterates until the answers converge.ย 
โ˜‘ It saves progress and resumes if interrupted.
โ˜‘ It handles weeks of work: bug hunts, security audits, huge migrations.

The proof, one engineer rebuilt an entire software from scratch. 750,000 lines of code in 11 days.

How to start (2 min):
1 โ†’ Turn on auto mode.
2 โ†’ Switch on "ultracode" in the effort menu.
3 โ†’ Give it one scoped task.

One warning: it burns way more tokens!

Most people think this is just for code.
Give the agents Skills, and it runs your whole business.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen
Leads entering your CRM get qualified in seconds.
Your SDRs stop researching.
They start selling.

When a lead arrives:
โœ“ Bright Data enriches from public sources
โœ“ AI identifies key insights
โœ“ Your CRM gets account intelligence

What gets uncovered:
โ†’ Business model and focus
โ†’ Growth indicators
โ†’ Technology requirements
โ†’ Budget signals

Delivered to your CRM:
โ†’ Account overview
โ†’ Decision-maker insights
โ†’ Business pain analysis
โ†’ ROI positioning
โ†’ Personalized outreach angle

SDRs focus on high-value activities.
Research runs in the background.

This process uses only publicly available business data and complies with privacy standards.

______

If youโ€™d like the workflow, let me know in the comments.
Post image by Yonathan Cohen

Related Influencers