Peer-review is dead. Einstein even knew it before it started: “Only one of Einstein’s papers was ever peer-reviewed and he was so surprised and upset that he published his paper in a different journal instead.“
Today, we are confronted with a publication monster machinery, in which too many scholars write too many papers because they have to. It leads to dream profits for a few publishers, because universities have to pay a fortune to buy access to the work of their own scholars.
And what comes out of this monster machinery is rarely helping to solve urgent global problems. Most of it cannot be replicated anyway. This however, is not so problematic, because the overwhelming majority of papers never get read and cited anyway.
A broken system of knowledge production.
Today, we are confronted with a publication monster machinery, in which too many scholars write too many papers because they have to. It leads to dream profits for a few publishers, because universities have to pay a fortune to buy access to the work of their own scholars.
And what comes out of this monster machinery is rarely helping to solve urgent global problems. Most of it cannot be replicated anyway. This however, is not so problematic, because the overwhelming majority of papers never get read and cited anyway.
A broken system of knowledge production.