Your MVP is probably not minimal enough.
(And that's bad.)
"MVP" doesn't mean "crappy version of your vision."
It means:
What's the smallest thing that proves your core assumption?
Most MVPs I see:
→ 15 features
→ 3 months(or more) to build Â
→ Try to solve everything
Real MVPs:
→ 1 core function
→ 2 weeks to build
→ Solve one specific pain
You're trying to then,
create a tight feedback loop.
Your MVP should solve one problem really well.
If it tries to solve everything, it solves nothing.
What was your first real MVP?
🔔 Follow Sanjeev Thapa for tech & startups
🔄 Repost if you've over-built an MVP
(And that's bad.)
"MVP" doesn't mean "crappy version of your vision."
It means:
What's the smallest thing that proves your core assumption?
Most MVPs I see:
→ 15 features
→ 3 months(or more) to build Â
→ Try to solve everything
Real MVPs:
→ 1 core function
→ 2 weeks to build
→ Solve one specific pain
You're trying to then,
create a tight feedback loop.
Your MVP should solve one problem really well.
If it tries to solve everything, it solves nothing.
What was your first real MVP?
🔔 Follow Sanjeev Thapa for tech & startups
🔄 Repost if you've over-built an MVP
