Claim 35 Post Templates from the 7 best LinkedIn Influencers

Get Free Post Templates
Abhishek Patil

Abhishek Patil

These are the best posts from Abhishek Patil.

3 viral posts with 5,725 likes, 344 comments, and 165 shares.
3 image posts, 0 carousel posts, 0 video posts, 0 text posts.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Go deeper on Abhishek Patil's LinkedIn with the ContentIn Chrome extension ๐Ÿ‘ˆ

Best Posts by Abhishek Patil on LinkedIn

PhonePe isn't the first UPI app ๐Ÿ’ธ
Maruti 800 wasn't the first family car ๐Ÿš™
Why first mover advantage is broken? โฌ‡๏ธ

Some context ๐Ÿ—“
While first mover advantage works in the western countries, it has almost never worked in the Indian market. Take PhonePe's example, it was 5 years behind Paytm to launch payments & is a UPI market leader (46% share).

Enter, the second mover advantage ๐Ÿƒ๐Ÿป
More importantly - why it works in India?

1/ India has ultra low trust levels ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ
With the amount of scams and pyramid schemes Indians have seen in the last few decades, they don't trust the โ€œnew shiny thingโ€œ. Although PayTm launched early, building trust with users & merchants took over a decade.

2/ Internet is still very new for most Indians ๐Ÿ“ฑ
While PayTM had to educate every merchant on why digital payments is the future, PhonePe had to undercut on pricing/ benefits. The market was ready to adopt by then.

3/ Wallet share is extremely limited ๐Ÿ’ณ
With $2250 of per capita income, Indians need extremely high value creation/ cash incentives to get them to try anything new. Remember the Uber/ swiggy days of crazy discounting? Gaining wallet share = cash dumping.

4/ Jugaad beats western solutions โš’
Paying for Music (Spotify) is unheard of for most Indians still today. No wonder YouTube (with ads) is the most popular form of music consumption.

5/ Scarcity of relevant builder talent ๐Ÿฅบ
Imagine hiring a payments engineer back in 2016 for PayTM - extremely hard to find that talent in Indian. I'm sure PhonePe could poach these engineers from PayTm and build stuff much faster from ground up.

6/ Unable to raise quick VC money ๐Ÿ•น
Until your product category has a huge competition within indian or an example to understand the business model from the western markets - it's really hard to raise money & convince VCs on depth of market.

So what should startup builders keep in mind? ๐Ÿง 

First Vs Second isn't a battle. But, if you are a first mover in a new category do few things that will increase your odds of winning the growth game.

First, raise more funding than you need - you will have to spend higher on customer education & won't be able to charge from Day 1.

Second, pick a go to market that solves a real problem - create enough value for the end user & value capture will follow.

Third, keep solving for trust across every kind of user story. Build it with your customers, vendors, investors & even the government for regulated category.

That's all for now ๐Ÿ’™
If you are building a product that has the first mover โ€œdisadvantageโ€œ, follow my weekly newsletter and build the muscle to solve specific problems that you will face on this journey.

Link first in comments โฌ‡๏ธ
Post image by Abhishek Patil
Adobe acquired Figma for $20 Billion ๐Ÿ”ฅ
This is one of the 25 acquisitions by Adobe so far ๐Ÿคฏ
Here's what's next for Figma <> Adobe users โฌ‡๏ธ

Quick context ๐Ÿ—“
Last night in a surprising move, the IPO bound, Figma was acquired in half cash & rest in stock deal by Adobe. In turn, wiping out Adobe's biggest competition in collaborative category of design. Interestingly, Adobe has a similar product to Figma called โ€œAdobe XDโ€œ.

Why the acquisition now? โœˆ๏ธ
Figma is on $81 million revenue run rate. It would be fair to say this category is โ€œownedโ€œ by adobe & it's adobe suite. Figma was eating a small pie in Adobe's $4.43 billion revenue. But, the pie was increasing. Figma grew from $50 million revenue to 60% year on year. That's crazy if you think about it for such a scaled company.

But there's more to this deal ๐Ÿคญ
Adobe has offered figma an insane revenue multiple valuation. The deal is almost 2.1X of Figma's last valuation of $9.1 Billion. Now, if you look at public markets for internet companies IPO'ing, the story hasn't been great. The Figma board & founders saw this & could not resist but take this deal. Nothing wrong in it.

What was Figma's win? โฌ‡๏ธ

First, Collaborative design ๐Ÿค
Creative process is collaboration first and that's what Figma focused on day 1. Sketch (from apple) / Adobe XD has so many problems with this collaboration (public vs private pages).

Second, the platform ๐Ÿ–ฅ
Figma focused on web apps as much as it focused on the desktop client app. This is a major insight founders had so early on. Most low capacity macs/windows laptops can not run heavy Adobe suite.

Third, low friction to adopt โœจ
My dad could potentially use figma with an hour of YouTube lessons. That's how easy it is. I feel figma took a lesson from Canva's learning book.

Fourth, the price point ๐Ÿ’ฐ
Again, it read the lesson out of Tally's book. Give your software for free for personal use and don't go hard on number of guests per workspace on figma. You have millions of users signing up, get addicted to figma and when they go & work in a team, they will have to signup for the team plan. (They'll happily get their employers pay for it).

So what's next for Figma? ๐ŸŽฏ
Most of the designer community is worried about the free to paid plans. I don't think Adobe is penny wise & pound foolish. It'll make Figma scale to market ceiling & then force employers pay for it, making billion dollar revenues every quarter.

But, it will go beyond ๐Ÿš€
If you read the fine print of what Figma founder said in the PR release, it says โ€œwe will have the opportunity to reimagine what the best creative tools could look like within the Figma technology stackโ€œ. So, Adobe suite integration inside figma is possible with cross selling now.

That's all for now โœจ
Learn the science of following the user in our newsletter for free. 25,000+ growth leaders from Airbnb, Slack, Zoho, Amazon, CRED, Freshworks & more consume it every week.

Subscribe link first in the comment โฌ‡๏ธ


Gif source : unknown
Post image by Abhishek Patil
2022: bigbasket.com posted โ‚น812Cr loss ๐Ÿ’ต
2016: PepperTap failed in less than 2 years ๐Ÿ“‰
Here's why Grocery business keeps failing โฌ‡๏ธ

Before we begin, I just hope it's 2030 & we have a profitable grocery company in India ๐Ÿคฒ๐Ÿป

Let's begin โœˆ๏ธ
Every year new grocery startups raise, build sleek product, hyper-grow & go bust. Whatever the reasons, they never turn a profit.

So what's behind every grocery business's failure? ๐Ÿค”
This question has haunted everyone who has ever worked on building a grocery business in the last 30 years. The answer lies in the nature of any grocery business. The four players - manufacturer, the distributor, the retailer, the last mile logistics play the game of bringing profits.

The manufacturer ๐Ÿญ
They never lose money & turn a good profit. These are the OG brands who are the nouns for grocery items in their loyal customer base - Aashirwaad for Atta, Parle/Britania for biscuits, Fourtune for sunflower oil & the list goes on. Typical margins 15 to 30%.

The distributor ๐Ÿšš
This player doesn't make huge profits but never makes a loss. If you are a grocery player and you rely on distributors - it's really hard to make any margins on most products. Typical margins 10 to 15%.

The retailer ๐Ÿฌ
They have to setup a store, get right branding, do marketing, solve for increasing time spent per customer in the store & 100s of other things. Typical margins 7 to 15%.

This is where it get's interesting โœจ
Most grocery startups have typically focused on two things.

First, eat into the distributor margins and buy in bulk from manufactures. Cutting the middle man. This has worked for few brands to reduce losses but no one, I repeat no one has turned operational profit, yet.

That brings us to the second point. Promote a whitelabeled product (Dunzo's own rice, Zepto's own oil, Dmart's own sugar & so on) to improve the 7% retailer margin to ~30% = {manufacturer + distributor + retailer}

But, it missed the important point ๐Ÿง 
Will you use a different toothpaste than Colgate & the next 2 brands? Will you change your choice of rice / daal. Maybe Sugar could be something you have flexibility of choice. But, that too if the non-branded sugar is cheaper. Changing a user behaviour to switch brands is huge & a retailer (let's say they even cut the distributor) can never compete with other brands to influence the end users.

My honest admission ๐Ÿ’™
This post was triggered when I visited a local Dmart type of store and when I saw the shopping cart at the billing counter. See the percentage of white-labled product in the cart. It's mere ~15% of the bill amount.

Now you know why grocery is hard ๐Ÿ’ก
Consume my free newsletter to learn the science of building strong business models for free. 25,000+ growth leaders from Airbnb, Slack, Zoho, Amazon, CRED, Freshworks & more consume it every week.

Link first in the comment ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป
Post image by Abhishek Patil

Related Influencers