With the fate of Tata Sons and thus that of the entire Tata group dependent on the performance of TCS - the management of TCS has become central to the survival of the House of Tatas.
With poor bets like Air India and insane bets like Tata Digital and Tata Electronics - the Tatas are not a case of execution failure but of pathetic strategy. Something that resonates in other professionally managed, board run, promoterless companies like L&T. Suddenly even a Adani or Ambani seems way more sensible. Niether bid for Air India - Adani smartly bought the airports and has now made a meal ticket out of Air India by servicing their planes. Ambani watches with delight as the rust within kills both Tatas and L&T. I still remember Dhirubhai Ambanis statement âL&T will do best as an arm of Relianceâ.
One of the issues that keeps coming up in professional company Board rooms is executive compensation. How much is enough ? TCS, Infosys and TechM are all board run. The CEOs running them have really zero skin in the game. They are executives working for a wage. And whatever more they can make. They donât share the founders passion and it is really just another job for them.
Finally when Mahindra British Telecon (now Tech Mahindra) was floundering, Anand paratroopers a team from HCL. Vineet Nayyar, CP Gurnani, Sanjay Kalra and Atul Kunwar dropped down out of nowhere to take over the company. It did wonders and they got scale by acquiring Satyam and diversifying globally. CPG was a larger than life CEO (who made the cardinal mistake of not diversifying into data centres and analytics) who did well for himself but not so much for the company.
When ai strikes, TechM will be the first to die. TCS next. Infosys next. And finally HCL and Wipro. That is because TechM and TCS didnât look after the techies and worshipped the slimy sales guys.
And the salaries reflect that. I looked at the salary sheet for 2023 and 2025 for all executives who drew over Rs one crore.
What stood out is that the TCS CEO draws 378 times the median salary of a TCS employee. And that his CTC has grown 200% in two years.
Now come to the TCS Fellows - the tech geniuses. The PhDs. The ones who are the tech backbone of the company. They are pathetically paid. Typically Rs 3 crores pa all inclusive.
A professor in a third grade govt engineering college in a fourth tier city has a CTC of Rs one crore. All thanks to the pay commission. Good professors in a tier 2 IIT like Ropar make Rs 5 crores pa in consulting revenue. The bright ones get a Padma Sri. So working for TCS is a waste of time for any techie.
So how do you structure compensation ? There is no one answer. But what Anand Mahindra did when he para dropped the leaders - is a good option.
All leadership members get a wage equivalent to what the TCS Fellows get. Say between Rs 2.5 and 4 crores depending on seniority. No one should be paid higher than the top techie. Plus they get esops linked to profit and valuation targets.
With poor bets like Air India and insane bets like Tata Digital and Tata Electronics - the Tatas are not a case of execution failure but of pathetic strategy. Something that resonates in other professionally managed, board run, promoterless companies like L&T. Suddenly even a Adani or Ambani seems way more sensible. Niether bid for Air India - Adani smartly bought the airports and has now made a meal ticket out of Air India by servicing their planes. Ambani watches with delight as the rust within kills both Tatas and L&T. I still remember Dhirubhai Ambanis statement âL&T will do best as an arm of Relianceâ.
One of the issues that keeps coming up in professional company Board rooms is executive compensation. How much is enough ? TCS, Infosys and TechM are all board run. The CEOs running them have really zero skin in the game. They are executives working for a wage. And whatever more they can make. They donât share the founders passion and it is really just another job for them.
Finally when Mahindra British Telecon (now Tech Mahindra) was floundering, Anand paratroopers a team from HCL. Vineet Nayyar, CP Gurnani, Sanjay Kalra and Atul Kunwar dropped down out of nowhere to take over the company. It did wonders and they got scale by acquiring Satyam and diversifying globally. CPG was a larger than life CEO (who made the cardinal mistake of not diversifying into data centres and analytics) who did well for himself but not so much for the company.
When ai strikes, TechM will be the first to die. TCS next. Infosys next. And finally HCL and Wipro. That is because TechM and TCS didnât look after the techies and worshipped the slimy sales guys.
And the salaries reflect that. I looked at the salary sheet for 2023 and 2025 for all executives who drew over Rs one crore.
What stood out is that the TCS CEO draws 378 times the median salary of a TCS employee. And that his CTC has grown 200% in two years.
Now come to the TCS Fellows - the tech geniuses. The PhDs. The ones who are the tech backbone of the company. They are pathetically paid. Typically Rs 3 crores pa all inclusive.
A professor in a third grade govt engineering college in a fourth tier city has a CTC of Rs one crore. All thanks to the pay commission. Good professors in a tier 2 IIT like Ropar make Rs 5 crores pa in consulting revenue. The bright ones get a Padma Sri. So working for TCS is a waste of time for any techie.
So how do you structure compensation ? There is no one answer. But what Anand Mahindra did when he para dropped the leaders - is a good option.
All leadership members get a wage equivalent to what the TCS Fellows get. Say between Rs 2.5 and 4 crores depending on seniority. No one should be paid higher than the top techie. Plus they get esops linked to profit and valuation targets.